What's new
Off Topix

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Trump Hush Money Trial to Begin This Week

Webster

Retired Snark Master
Administrator
Posts
22,220
Likes
12,535
Points
2,645
 
(The Guardian) Donald Trump faces trial over hush money
Today marks a first in American history: a US president is going on trial for criminal charges.

Donald Trump, winner of the 2016 election, loser in 2020 and now once again the presumptive Republican nominee in 2024, is accused of attempting to interfere with the first of those elections, by paying hush money to hide information from the American voters – specifically, the fact that he had an affair with an adult film star, Stephanie Clifford, AKA Stormy Daniels.

Prosecutors say he had his attorney, Michael Cohen, pay $130,000 to a Daniels attorney in order to buy her silence. Similarly, they say he participated in a “catch and kill” scheme with the National Enquirer to buy another affair story – this one from the Playboy model Karen McDougall – in order to not publish it.

Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records after he allegedly repaid his lawyer, Michael Cohen, for the payments but listed them as legal fees. This would, prosecutors say, violate campaign finance law because the payments were intended to keep valuable information away from US voters right before the 2016 election.

All of this came, if you’ll recall, around the time of the infamous Access Hollywood tape, where Trump bragged he could sexually assault women because of his fame. Prosecutors say Trump was terrified that if another story came out, about affairs with a porn star, it could cost him the 2016 election. Of course, the story didn’t come out, and he won the presidency.

It is a tricky case – not necessarily because of the facts of the hush-money payments themselves, but because prosecutors will have to prove Trump’s intent to commit a crime.

It also plays out in the thick of a presidential campaign, where Trump is running neck and neck in the polls with the US president, Joe Biden.
 
(The Guardian) Dozens of New Yorkers say they can't be fair and impartial for Trump jury
In just five hours of jury selection, Donald Trump has seen dozens of New Yorkers say that they could not be fair and impartial.

These prospective jurors have been excused from serving on the case, of course, but it still must smart a bit: This is Trump’s home town, after all, but he is so polarising that his compatriots want out.

One juror did appear to make Trump’s morning, however. The prospect said “yes” to question 36 on the selection questionnaire, which was: “The defendant in this case has written a number of books. Have you read (or listened to audio) of any one or more of these books? If so, which ones?”

The potential panelist revealed “I read the Art of the Deal, and I want to say How to be Rich, and Think Like a Champion - is that right?” The panelist hesitated, uncertain as to whether this was the title. Trump nodded his head and offered a smile.
 
This will be Trump pretty soon coming out of the court room. :p

Steve Bannon Jail GIF by GIPHY News
 
(The Guardian) Juror excused after concerns over aspects of identity made public
Judge Merchan says Juror 2 contacted the court and said she had concerns about her ability to be fair and impartial. This is the oncology nurse from the Upper East Side.

Speaking in court, she says she “definitely has concerns now” about what has been reported about her publicly.

She says she had friends, colleagues and family conveying to her that she had been identified as a potential juror.
Judge Merchan just admonished the press for using physical descriptors to describe jurors. He said: I would recommend the press simply apply common sense and refrain from anything that has to do, for example, with physical descriptions. It’s just not necessary, it serves no purpose.

He said that if the press continues to write about physical descriptors, he is willing to take additional steps to conceal the identities of jurors.
 
Can't say that I blame her. I wouldn't want to have the wrath of Trump Supporters come down on me if I voted Trump guilty. No friggin way lol
 
Democrats are hell bent on getting Trump convicted reducing chances of him becoming President .

The lawyer Trump recruited are not really helping him either way .
 

Create an account or login to post a reply

You must be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Create an account here on Off Topix. It's quick & easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom